Inland navigation in Europe is proposed to increase in the coming years, being promoted as a low-carbon form of transport. However, we currently lack knowledge on how this would impact biodiversity at large scales and interact with existing stressors. Here we addressed this knowledge gap by analysing fish and macroinvertebrate community time series across large European rivers comprising 19,592 observations from 4,049 sampling sites spanning the past 32 years. We found ship traffic to be associated with biodiversity declines, that is, loss of fish and macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, diversity and trait richness. Ship traffic was also associated with increases in taxonomic evenness, which, in concert with richness decreases, was attributed to losses in rare taxa. Ship traffic was especially harmful for benthic taxa and those preferring slow flows. These effects often depended on local land use and riparian degradation. In fish, negative impacts of shipping were highest in urban and agricultural landscapes. Regarding navigation infrastructure, the negative impact of channelization on macroinvertebrates was evident only when riparian degradation was also high. Our results demonstrate the risk of increasing inland navigation on freshwater biodiversity. Integrative waterway management accounting for riparian habitats and landscape characteristics could help to mitigate these impacts.

Stream ecosystems are inherently dependent on their surroundings and, thus, highly vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts, which alter both their structure and functioning. Anchored in biologically-mediated processes, the response of stream ecosystem functioning to environmental conditions exhibits intricate patterns, reflecting both natural dynamics and human-induced changes. Our study aimed at determining the natural and anthropogenic drivers influencing multiple stream ecosystems processes (nutrient uptake, biomass accrual, decomposition, and ecosystem metabolism) at a regional scale. By examining 38 natural and anthropogenic variables across 63 stream reaches in Gipuzkoa (northern Iberian Peninsula), we used structural equation modeling to unravel the cascading effect of basin- and reach-scale drivers onto ecosystem process. The results reveal significant variability in ecosystem processes, with contrasting spatial patterns, suggesting that studied processes respond differently to environmental factors. Urban land-use emerged as a primary basin-scale driver, whereas reach-scale variables reflected both natural and anthropogenic influence. Nutrient uptake rates were primarily driven by nutrient concentrations in stream water, but models for biomass accrual, decomposition, and ecosystem metabolism exhibited more complex cause-effect relationships. Our findings highlight the impact of urban areas on multiple ecosystem processes and services, disproportionate when considering their small land cover. The present study emphasizes the convenience of measuring multiple ecosystem functions simultaneously to get a comprehensive diagnosis of the functional status of rivers.

Insects are a main component of a stable ecosystem and influence crop production. Pollinators, in particular, by regulating pollination between flowers, shape and secure plant communities around crop fields. They are also essential for food provisioning by sustaining the pollination of crops. Studies in recent decades have been covering the mixture of effects various factors have on pollinators. However, there is still a gap in understanding how different taxa in pollinator guilds respond to these pressures and how is network structure affected by it. Therefore, here we tried to further uncover the complex relationship between habitat suitability and pollinator biodiversity in an agro-riparian matrix. Using bipartite network analysis and geographical information systems (GIS) in four sites with different land cover configuration, we assessed faunal and floral diversity, land cover differences and network metrics. Hymenoptera were responsible for most of the visits, while also exhibiting higher levels of richness across sites. Lepidoptera on the other hand, were the order less represented. Overall, tillage intensity and Arundo donax were determinant in differences in the number of visits for both orders, with Diptera and Coleoptera being less affected. However, results regarding visitation rates reported tillage’s higher explanatory power, in comparison with A. donax. Intensive sites showed significantly higher levels of nestedness and lower specialization and diversity across taxa. The results suggest that intensive agriculture and exotic species infestation can impact pollinator taxa differently, thus influencing network structure. By scoping network metrics, we can better determine what species are more affected by agricultural expansion, assess ecosystem resilience and consequently, determine appropriate conservation measures to maintain stable plant-pollinator networks.

In this study, we explored how barriers such as dams have affected the longitudinal connectivity of riverine habitats from the perspective of potamodromous fish. For this purpose, connectivity changes are investigated in the central part of the Austrian Danube system, where the national reporting for the EU Water Framework Directive provides detailed information on the position and characteristics of barriers as well as the distribution range of native fish species. This assessment is based on an estimation regarding the quantitative upstream and downstream passability of individual barriers, where we further investigate three different passability scenarios to account for uncertainties. We then apply several combinations of passability scenarios and assumptions on dispersal distances to calculate a series of network-based reach and catchment connectivity indices. On average, the estimation of barrier passability indicated a high downstream passability, while upstream passability was substantially lower across scenarios. Furthermore, existing fish passes were estimated to have increased passability on average between 20 % and 24 %. Overall, the results indicated a strong effect of barriers on the longitudinal connectivity of the investigated river network. Catchment scale indices revealed a loss of connectivity, which increased with dispersal distance. Reach connectivity indices displayed a strong disruption of the natural connectivity gradient along the river network and indicated that individual river reaches have, on average, become more isolated in addition to the overall decrease in connectivity. The average loss of connectivity across scenarios was estimated at 72 % (SD = 16 %) when taking into account all connections to other reaches and 66 % (SD = 7 %) when only connections to upstream reaches were considered. We conclude that longitudinal connectivity in the Austrian Danube system is still severely compromised, making it increasingly challenging for potamodromous fish species to complete their life cycle. This issue is further amplified by the severe loss of fish habitats as a consequence of river engineering.

Agriculture impacts the ecological status of freshwaters through multiple pressures such as diffuse pollution, water abstraction, and hydromorphological alteration, strongly impairing riverine biodiversity. The agricultural effects, however, likely differ between agricultural types and practices. In Europe, agricultural types show distinct spatial patterns related to intensity, biophysical conditions, and socioeconomic history, which have been operationalised by various landscape typologies. Our study aimed at analysing whether incorporating agricultural intensity enhances the correlation between agricultural land use and the ecological status. For this, we aggregated the continent's agricultural activities into 20 Areas of Farming-induced Freshwater Pressures (AFFP), specifying individual pressure profiles regarding nutrient enrichment, pesticides, water abstraction, and agricultural land use in the riparian zone to establish an agricultural intensity index and related this intensity index to the river ecological status. Using the agricultural intensity index, nearly doubled the correlative strength between agriculture and the ecological status of rivers as compared to the share of agriculture in the sub-catchment (based on the analysis of more than 50,000 sub-catchment units). Strongest agricultural pressures were found for high intensity cropland in the Mediterranean and Temperate regions, while extensive grassland, fallow farmland and livestock farming in the Northern and Highland regions, as well as low intensity mosaic farming, featured lowest pressures. The results provide advice for pan-European management of freshwater ecosystems and highlight the urgent need for more sustainable agriculture. Consequently, they can also be used as a basis for European Union-wide and global policies to halt biodiversity decline, such as the post-2027 renewal of the Common Agricultural Policy.

In an attempt to halt and reverse biodiversity losses, the European Commission has proposed a new regulation, the Nature Restoration Law (NRL). It could become a cornerstone of Europe’s ambitions to restore biodiversity and ecosystem services for decades to come (1) and demonstrate global leadership in addressing ongoing environmental crises. The draft of the law, which is a first globally, has been under political pressure from various sides, and scientists have contributed intensively to the discussion (2). After trilogue negotiations among the European Parliament, the Council of Europe, and the European Commission, the final text of the NRL has been agreed on (see the box). However, it will still be subject to final votes within the Council and Parliament. Here, we assess the potential for the NRL to overcome problems associated with implementation of related European Union (EU) legislation, strategies, and policies and what can be learned for implementation of the NRL.

River ecosystems host a large biodiversity and provide essential ecosystem services but are threatened by multiple anthropogenic activities that degrade their structure and functioning. Although both structure and functioning are key components of ecological status, river monitoring programmes rely almost exclusively on structural indicators, such as community structure, or water quality, neglecting functional attributes. Scientists have pointed towards some promising functions, such as organic matter decomposition, as potential indicators of river functional status. However, it may not be the best indicator to assess the ecosystem functioning of river ecosystem subjected to certain impacts, such as nutrient inputs. Additionally, managers have seldom used functional indicators, probably because of the lack of simple, routine protocols. Here we present the nutrient uptake bioassay (NUB), a simple and straightforward method to measure nutrient uptake by river biofilm that could be developed as a functional indicator of river ecological status. The NUB consists in deploying biofilm carriers in the river for a specific period, allowing biofilm colonization. Biofilm carriers are then incubated in the field in a nutrient-enriched standard solution for one hour and finally the remaining nutrient concentration in the standard medium is measured. Nutrient uptake is calculated from the difference between the initial and final nutrient concentrations. Chlorophyll in the biofilm carriers can also be measured to calculate biofilm accrual rates. The NUB has been developed based on a mesocosm and a field experiments, which showed that the NUB provides additional, non-redundant information to current biomonitoring techniques. Overall, the NUB is a cheap, robust and reliable method that can be applied by most river monitoring practitioners and can be adapted to most river types and situations. As nutrient uptake is linked to the self-purification capacity of rivers, the NUB results provide information about an important ecosystem service. Therefore, we suggest that the NUB can be developed as part of the monitoring toolbox available for managers to improve the assessment of river ecological status and to diagnose the causes of ecosystem impairment.

Sustainable management of lakes requires us to overcome ecological, economic, and social challenges. These challenges can be addressed by focusing on achieving ecological improvement within a multifaceted, co-beneficial context. In-lake restoration measures may promote more rapid ecosystem responses than is feasible with catchment measures alone, even if multiple interventions are needed. In particular, we identify restoration methods that support the overarching societal target of a circular economy through the use of nutrients, sediments, or biomass that are removed from a lake, in agriculture, as food, or for biogas production. In this emerging field of sustainable restoration techniques, we show examples, discuss benefits and pitfalls, and flag areas for further research and development. Each lake should be assessed individually to ensure that restoration approaches will effectively address lake-specific problems, do not harm the target lake or downstream ecosystems, are cost-effective, promote delivery of valuable ecosystem services, minimize conflicts in public interests, and eliminate the necessity for repeated interventions. Achieving optimal, sustainable results from lake restoration relies on multidisciplinary research and close interactions between environmental, social, political, and economic sectors.

In Northern Finland, the most significant land use challenges are related to bioenergy production from peat extraction and forest biomass. Increasing societal demand for bioenergy may increase production rates. However, environmental impacts of peat extraction are of increasing concern, which has led to a decline in production, thereby freeing up these areas for other uses. Using storylines for different societal futures and process-based models (PERSiST and INCA), we simulated the effect of simultaneous land use change and climate change on water quality (phosphorus, nitrogen and suspended sediments concentration). Conversion of peat extraction areas to arable land, together with climate change, may pose a risk for deterioration of ecological status. On the other hand, continuous forestry may have positive impacts on water quality. Suspended sediment concentrations in the river do not exceed water quality requirements for salmonids, but nitrogen concentrations may exceed threshold values especially during high flows. A storyline emphasizing sustainable development in energy production led to the best outcome in terms of water protection.

After drainage for forestry and agriculture, peat extraction is one of the most important causes of peatland degradation. When peat extraction is ceased, multiple after-use options exist, including abandonment, restoration, and replacement (e.g., forestry and agricultural use). However, there is a lack of a global synthesis of after-use research. Through a systematic review of 356 peer-reviewed scientific articles, we address this research gap and examine (1) what after-use options have been studied, (2) what the studied and recognized impacts of the after-use options are, and (3) what one can learn in terms of best practices and research gaps. The research has concentrated on the impacts of restoration (N = 162), abandonment (N = 72), and replacement (N = 94), the latter of which consists of afforestation (N = 46), cultivation (N = 34) and creation of water bodies (N = 14). The studies on abandonment, restoration, and creation of water bodies have focused mostly on analyzing vegetation and greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, while the studies assessing afforestation and cultivation sites mostly evaluate the provisioning ecosystem services. The studies show that active restoration measures speed-up vegetation recolonization on bare peat areas, reduce GHG emissions and decrease negative impacts on water systems. The most notable research gap is the lack of studies comparing the environmental and social impacts of the after-use options. Additionally, there is a lack of studies focusing on social impacts and downstream hydrology, as well as long-term monitoring of GHG fluxes. Based on the reviewed studies, a comparison of the impacts of the after-use options is not straightforward. We emphasize a need for comparative empirical research in the extracted sites with a broad socio-ecological and geographical context.

After drainage for forestry and agriculture, peat extraction is one of the most important causes of peatland degradation. When peat extraction is ceased, multiple after-use options exist, including abandonment, restoration, and replacement (e.g., forestry and agricultural use). However, there is a lack of a global synthesis of after-use research. Through a systematic review of 356 peer-reviewed scientific articles, we address this research gap and examine (1) what after-use options have been studied, (2) what the studied and recognized impacts of the after-use options are, and (3) what one can learn in terms of best practices and research gaps. The research has concentrated on the impacts of restoration (N = 162), abandonment (N = 72), and replacement (N = 94), the latter of which consists of afforestation (N = 46), cultivation (N = 34) and creation of water bodies (N = 14). The studies on abandonment, restoration, and creation of water bodies have focused mostly on analyzing vegetation and greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, while the studies assessing afforestation and cultivation sites mostly evaluate the provisioning ecosystem services. The studies show that active restoration measures speed-up vegetation recolonization on bare peat areas, reduce GHG emissions and decrease negative impacts on water systems. The most notable research gap is the lack of studies comparing the environmental and social impacts of the after-use options. Additionally, there is a lack of studies focusing on social impacts and downstream hydrology, as well as long-term monitoring of GHG fluxes. Based on the reviewed studies, a comparison of the impacts of the after-use options is not straightforward. We emphasize a need for comparative empirical research in the extracted sites with a broad socio-ecological and geographical context.

Cities are central to improving natural resource management globally. Instead of reinventing the wheel for each interlinked sustainability priority, we suggest synergising with, and learning from existing net-zero carbon initiatives to explicitly tackle another vital element: phosphorus. To achieve net-zero phosphorus actors must work together to (1) minimise loss flows out of the city, (2) maximise recycling flows from the city to agricultural lands, and (3) minimise the need for phosphorus in food production.